Showing posts with label film vs digital photography. Show all posts
Showing posts with label film vs digital photography. Show all posts

Tuesday, 27 April 2010

Film Digital Photography

1
film digital photography

The Positives and Negatives of A Digital Photography

Positives




. Low Costs




One particular of the strengths which digital camera cameras supply will be the actual simple fact of which it is mainly realistic as well as easy. Right now there is cheaper expense in the extensive function because one have to have certainly not acquire films ever again as well as will probably need to have not necessarily develop the images the older design means. These people would probably merely have to have for you to demand the particular electric batteries acquire a realistically massive memory stick and they are very good to move.




. Greater storage area




Photography enthusiasts can easily today save the particular images which they will possess utilized in their particular desktops and throughout their particular cd albums, making it possible for these individuals to be able to work with the actual memory space stick in excess of as well as above just as before. Generally there will be simply no additional need to have so that you can save rolls of film and get worried that they will may possibly break down.




. Producing advantage




One more benefit in which digital camera provide is the reality that will it can easily be published in house the identical method just one could produce virtually any variety connected with file offer is the fact that it can be printed at home the identical method one might printing any style of file. If not pleased with image taken you can modify your current pictures.Using your computer or your iphone using iphone photo apps .




. Trial and Error




One more ease that digital cameras produce is the actual actuality this one particular can easily basically watch the photos right after taking it in addition to get the particular selection of eliminating it as soon as it is usually certainly not excellent. This, in respect to professionals, destroys professional photographers. Simply because these people can easily perform a consider around along with above once more, they don't discover the particular control of setting up for their shot ahead of in fact pushing the switch. Nevertheless, for the beginner professional photographer, this kind of can be just like manna inside heaven as this makes it possible for them to quickly acquire very good images and see his or her faults.




Negatives




a single. Require with regard to Personal computer reading and writing. Identical to film digital photography exactly where an individual require to be additionally comfortable with doing work inside the darker area, one requires to possess a degree associated with pc expertise. Not really just can an individual be saving your current pictures in the computer, performing the digital camera is like performing a small computer. You truly have to be pc literate in purchase in order to improve the characteristics of your digital camera.




. Beauty is actually dropped




Presently there are several that claim that craftsmanship and improvisation is misplaced when using a digital camera simply because photographers do not shoot using various effects. For instance, some would not bother to blur the background anymore because they can fix the photo in Photoshop and other photo editing application. One can do a number of things with the computer, erase flaws, fix red eyes and sharpen some features.


About the Author

I grew up in the village of Romsley, to the south of Birmingham in central England. At 18 I went to Loughborough University to do a degree in Journalism - Right now I'm a professional writers for los angeles mobile apps company.



Fuji G-617 Panoramic Camera - A film camera that is Great for Landscape Photography...









film digital photography5
film digital photography5
film digital photography5

Saturday, 31 October 2009

Film Digital Photography

1
film digital photography
Looking to get into photography.. film or digital? and what camera is best?

I have recently become interested in photography.. mainly animals/horses. I'm in need of a new camera, and I have no idea what to get. I know that I want a camera with a sports setting (i.e. getting several shots of a horse jumping) and is film photography too complex for an amateur? Thanks!
also.. when you have a film camera, what is the process to getting your photos devolped? (I'm very new at this..)


i agree with the answer that chris gave, you get to see the results right away insted of waiting to see what u did and trying to remember exactly how and what and where it was with film. i have a ricoh 35 mm, my dad owns 2 bronica etrs's, he has a Canon 40D and I have a Canon D30 both digital, the cost of the film is also another deciding fact, film is costly, not that a pro digital camera isn't, but you have to get it developed unless you develop it yourself which can still get costly when you have to buy the chemicals and trays along with enlargers and the meters for the darkroom, but with the digitalis all you need is a memory card, depending on the camera its either a compact flash or SD, some even have some built in memory, a computer and possibly some sort of photo editing software and a card reader. with the kind of pictures you want to take, the horses jumping you will need a high speed camera with a compact flash which is a high speed memory card, i would suggest digital they seem better for beginners, even though film has some advantages that you can't take advantage of with digital, my suggestion to youwouldd be a digital Canon,an older one or Rebel XS or rebel XSI, check craigslist.com (thats where i got my D30 for really cheap) the Canon's in my opinion are just simple to use and work very well. I hope i was of some help for you.


Pentax 67 film loading presented by 1ProPhoto.Com









film digital photography5
film digital photography5

Friday, 7 August 2009

Film Vs Digital Photography

1
film vs digital photography
Canon A-1 vs Canon AE-1 & making artistic images?

So basically i'm new to traditional SLR photography. My friend owns a Canon AE-1 and produces BEAUTIFUL artistic, grainy, colorful, flawed images (which I want to do also!). They look quite lomographic (I think thats the right word) The guy at the store said if I was going to get an AE-1 that I might as well get the A-1 and that it could do the same and more as the AE-1. Well, basically the A-1 produces images that are "too clear" for me, and even with the same film as my friend uses for her AE-1, it looks almost like a digital photo. I think i'm going to take it back to exchange for an AE-1 instead. Can someone with photo advice help me choose whether or not this is a good idea? Thanks so much for your help.


There is nothing wrong with your camera. If you want flawed images you should just buy a lomo camera or a diana. your friends camera is old and is desperate need of maintaince.

You actually got a well functioning canon a1. (which is an updated model of the ae1.

Really you have two options.
One. Buy a lomo or diane
two. Drop your camera on the floor and throw it in the wash cycle of your washing machine. That ought to damage your camera sufficiently to get the result you are after.

the canon a1 were percise tools made for serious photographers who were serious about learning their craft (exposure, composition and light).
Lomo and diane were toys made for people who find inaccurate, poorly made cameras, artistic


Estevan Oriol Vlog #3: Digital Era Vs. Film Era









film vs digital photography5
film vs digital photography5

Wednesday, 23 July 2008

Film Vs Digital Photography

1
film vs digital photography
For digital photography - is "just like film" still the goal?

...or have we surpassed that? I am not trying to start a film vs. digital war, but I am asking whether you think digital photography is still chasing certain qualities of film imagery or if it has gone off in its own directions, with new standards.

"Grain," colors, sharpness, dynamic range...

Whatever you think of is valid, but please try to avoid elevated blood pressures and emotionally charged responses.
My point is NOT to decide whether film is better than digital or not! Please don't go there.

My question is whether you or not think that digital has arrived as its own medium, no longer feeling the pressureto "chase after film."

Yes, film is better and will always BE better at certain things, but digital is better at certain other things.

My point is to ask whether digital has matured into its own tree from the tree from which it fell or if it is still just the red-headed step-child, struggling for recognition in the world.


Just like film is still the goal until the prices of digital cameras decline and technology stabilizes, doesn't obsolete itself so quickly. Achieving something just like film is not available to most consumers unless they purchase expensive cameras, I believe in the $5000-$6000 range. I have a NikonD200, already it is obsolete with the D300 that just came out.


Film Vs Digital_MP4 HD 360.mp4









film vs digital photography5
film vs digital photography5
film vs digital photography5